An independent third-party conformity assessment organisation formally designated by a national notifying authority under the EU AI Act (Articles 29–39) to audit and certify high-risk AI systems — particularly biometric identification and product-safety-component systems — against technical documentation, quality management, and harmonised standards requirements.

Semantic Classification

Content

  • A conformity assessment body notified under the AI Act and other relevant EU harmonisation legislation, responsible for performing third-party conformity assessment of certain high-risk AI systems.

    Source

    Primary: EU AI Act Article 3(33), Articles 29-39 Context: Independent third-party certification

    Regulatory Context

    Notified bodies provide independent, expert verification that high-risk AI systems meet EU AI Act requirements. They serve as trusted third-party assessors, bringing specialised technical expertise and impartiality to conformity assessment.

    Role and Function

    Third-Party Conformity Assessment (Annex VII)

    For high-risk AI systems requiring notified body involvement:

    Quality Management System Assessment

  • Review provider’s quality management system (Article 17)

  • Verify system ensures AI Act compliance

  • Conduct on-site audits

  • Issue approval or non-approval

    Technical Documentation Review

  • Examine technical documentation (Annex IV)

  • Verify completeness and compliance evidence

  • Assess risk management system

  • Evaluate data governance measures

  • Review testing and validation results

    Surveillance

  • Monitor certified AI systems

  • Conduct periodic audits

  • Respond to complaints

  • Verify continued compliance

    When Notified Body Required

    Annex VII Conformity Assessment

    Third-party notified body involvement mandated for:

    1. Biometric Systems in Annex III(1)

  • Remote biometric identification

  • Biometric categorisation

  • Emotion recognition (in certain contexts)

    Except: When provider uses harmonised standards or common specifications covering all requirements

    2. AI as Product Safety Component (Article 6(1))

    High-risk AI systems integrated into products covered by Annex I legislation where:

  • Product requires third-party conformity assessment

  • AI is safety component

    Examples:

  • AI in medical devices (MDR, IVDR)

  • AI in machinery (Machinery Regulation)

  • AI in aviation systems

    Internal Control Alternative (Annex VI)

    Providers may self-assess (without notified body) for:

  • Annex III systems using harmonised standards/common specifications covering all requirements

  • Standalone high-risk AI not in biometric categories

    Designation Process

    Notifying Authority Responsibility (Article 28)

    Each Member State designates notifying authority to:

  • Assess conformity assessment bodies

  • Designate qualified bodies as notified bodies

  • Notify European Commission and other Member States

  • Monitor notified body performance

  • Suspend/withdraw designation if non-compliant

    Qualification Criteria (Article 31)

    Organisational Requirements

  • Legal entity: Established under national law

  • Third-party status: Independent from AI providers, deployers

  • Impartiality: Free from conflicts of interest

  • Confidentiality: Protect commercial secrets

  • Liability insurance: Adequate coverage

    Technical Competence

  • AI expertise: Machine learning, neural networks, AI architectures

  • Sector knowledge: Domain-specific understanding (healthcare, finance, etc.)

  • Quality management: ISO 17065 or equivalent

  • Testing capability: Evaluation tools and methodologies

    Personnel Requirements

  • Qualified staff: Technical and legal AI experts

  • Ongoing training: Up-to-date with AI developments

  • Sufficient capacity: Resources to handle assessment volume

    Procedural Requirements

  • Documented procedures: Conformity assessment methodology

  • Record keeping: Assessment documentation

  • Reporting: To notifying authority and Commission

    Accreditation (Article 32)

    Notified bodies should be accredited to:

  • ISO/IEC 17065: Conformity assessment bodies certifying products, processes, services

  • Sectoral standards: Domain-specific accreditation (medical, automotive)

    Notified Body Obligations (Articles 33-37)

    Conformity Assessment Execution (Article 33)

  • Conduct assessments proportionately, avoiding unnecessary provider burdens

  • Complete assessments within reasonable timeframe

  • Respect confidentiality of provider information

  • Charge fees proportionate to assessment scope

    Identification Number (Article 34)

  • Assigned by Commission upon notification

  • Displayed with CE marking when notified body involved

    Information Obligations (Article 35)

    To Notifying Authority

  • Assessment activities

  • Issued, suspended, withdrawn certificates

  • Non-compliance cases

  • Refusals to assess

    To Other Notified Bodies

  • Share best practices

  • Coordinate on similar systems

  • Ensure consistent approach

    To Commission/AI Board

  • Assessment methodologies

  • Sector-specific challenges

  • Recommendations for standards

    Peer Review Participation (Article 36)

  • Facilitate notifying authority monitoring

  • Participate in coordination activities

  • Contribute to harmonised practices

    Subsidiaries and Subcontracting (Article 37)

  • May use subsidiaries/subcontractors with notifying authority approval

  • Retain full responsibility for assessment quality

  • Ensure subcontractor competence

    Revocation and Suspension

    Grounds (Article 38)

    Notifying authority may suspend/withdraw designation if:

  • No longer meets designation criteria

  • Fails to perform obligations

  • Breaches confidentiality

  • Issues non-compliant certificates

    Procedure

  • Investigation of suspected non-compliance

  • Opportunity for notified body to respond

  • Formal decision with reasoning

  • Notification to Commission and other Member States

  • Provider notification (for affected certificates)

    Affected AI Systems

    If designation withdrawn:

  • Valid certificates: May remain valid if compliant

  • Pending assessments: Transfer to another notified body

  • Provider options: Re-certification by another notified body

    Certificates Issued

    EU Technical Documentation Assessment Certificate

    Confirms:

  • Technical documentation compliant with Annex IV

  • AI system meets AI Act requirements

  • Risk management system adequate

  • Quality management system effective

    Validity: Typically 5 years (may vary by assessment scope)

    Surveillance Reports

    Periodic verification of continued compliance:

  • Annual surveillance audits

  • Extraordinary audits (if serious incident or non-compliance suspected)

    Coordination Mechanisms

    Sectoral Groups

    Notified bodies coordinate by sector:

  • Medical AI: Notified bodies for medical devices

  • Automotive AI: Notified bodies for machinery/vehicles

  • Aviation AI: Notified bodies for aviation products

    Cross-Border Coordination

  • Joint assessments: For AI systems used EU-wide

  • Mutual recognition: Accept other notified bodies’ findings (with verification)

  • Information exchange: Technical insights, emerging risks

    Relationship to Other Bodies

    Notifying Authorities (Article 28)

  • Designation: Notifying authority appoints notified body

  • Monitoring: Authority oversees notified body performance

  • Enforcement: Authority can suspend/withdraw designation

    AI Office and AI Board

  • Guidance: AI Office provides interpretative guidance

  • Coordination: AI Board facilitates harmonised approach

  • Reporting: Notified bodies report assessment challenges

    Providers

  • Contractual: Provider engages notified body for assessment

  • Fee-based: Provider pays for conformity assessment services

  • Cooperative: Provider provides documentation and access

    Market Surveillance Authorities (Article 74)

  • Post-market: Authorities verify notified body certificate validity

  • Investigation: Authorities may question notified body findings

  • Corrective action: Authorities can order re-assessment

    Fees and Costs

    Provider Responsibility

  • Assessment fees: Notified body charges provider

  • Market-based: Competitive pricing among notified bodies

  • Proportionate: Fees reflect assessment scope and complexity

    Typical Fee Components

  • Application review

  • Documentation assessment

  • On-site audit

  • Surveillance activities

  • Certificate issuance

    Transition Period

    Existing Notified Bodies (Annex I Legislation)

    Notified bodies under existing product legislation (MDR, Machinery, etc.) may:

  • Extend notification to cover AI Act requirements

  • Undergo additional competence assessment for AI

  • Begin AI conformity assessments once AI Act applicable

    New Notified Bodies

    Member States designate new notified bodies specifically for:

  • Standalone high-risk AI (Annex III biometric systems)

  • AI conformity assessment expertise

    Timeline: Notified body provisions (Articles 28-39) became applicable 2 August 2025. However, high-risk AI obligations for Annex I product-regulated systems (where third-party notified body assessment is primarily required) have been deferred to 2 August 2028 under the Digital Omnibus provisional agreement of May 2026. High-risk Annex III use-based systems obligations are deferred to 2 December 2027.

  • Conformity Assessment (AI-0145): Process notified bodies perform

  • Notifying Authority: Entity designating notified bodies

  • CE Marking (AI-0146): Mark accompanied by notified body number

  • Quality Management System (Article 17): System notified bodies assess

    Practical Implications

    For Providers

  • Select notified body early in development

  • Engage notified body for pre-assessment advice

  • Prepare comprehensive technical documentation

  • Budget for assessment fees and timeline

    For Member States

  • Ensure sufficient notified body capacity

  • Designate bodies with AI expertise

  • Monitor notified body performance

  • Coordinate across Member States

    See Also

  • EU AI Act Articles 29-39 (Notified Bodies)

  • Article 43 (Conformity Assessment Procedures)

  • Annex VII (Quality Management System Assessment)

  • Regulation (EU) 765/2008 (Accreditation and Market Surveillance)

Provenance