Narrative Goldmine

Regulatory Framework

5 min read

Properties

Type
  • Class
Resource
  • urn:ngm:class:regulatory-framework
Domain
  • governance
Status
  • stable
Maturity
  • emerging
Quality
  • 0.72
Is a
Has part
Requires
Enables
Generated
  • by: process:vault-migrate/1.0 · at: 2026-09-22T12:41:39.024503178Z
Bridges to
Contrasts with
Depends on
Implements
Legacy term id
  • NGM-7028
Links
Page resource
  • urn:visionflow:page:39ac5cb7d080793b0655477a4d7aa53ab38557a55a01d96bceb20500851a7dd4
Related to
Standardized by

A regulatory framework for blockchain and cryptoassets comprises the laws, regulations, guidelines, and supervisory structures established by governmental authorities to govern the issuance, trading, and custody of digital assets. These frameworks address consumer protection, market integrity, anti-money laundering compliance, and financial stability whilst balancing innovation enablement with risk mitigation.

Semantic Classification

Content

Overview

2025 marked a turning point in how governments regulate cryptoassets. Instead of relying on enforcement actions to shape the industry, jurisdictions worldwide implemented comprehensive frameworks with requirements defined upfront. With stablecoins reaching record highs in 2025, they dominated the global policy agenda, with over 70% of jurisdictions advancing new stablecoin regulatory frameworks.

Major Jurisdictions

United States

  • GENIUS Act (signed 18 July 2025): First comprehensive federal cryptocurrency framework in US history

  • Passed 68-30 in Senate, 308-122 in House

  • Mandates 100% reserve backing for stablecoins

  • Establishes federal and state licensing pathways

  • CLARITY Act: Defines how digital assets are treated under securities and commodities laws

  • Passed House in 2025; pending in Senate

  • Aims to reduce regulatory overlap between SEC and CFTC

  • Joint SEC-CFTC statement on regulatory harmonisation issued September 2025

    European Union

  • MiCA Regulation remains the most comprehensive regulatory framework globally

  • Full applicability achieved 30 December 2024

  • Over 40 CASP licences issued across member states by early 2025

  • MiCAR framework already under review with proposals for enhanced ESMA supervisory role

  • See EU MiCA Regulation for detailed coverage

    Asia-Pacific

  • Singapore: Extended oversight to all local crypto firms

  • Hong Kong: A-S-P-I-Re framework launched; stablecoin regime went live 1 August 2025

  • Pakistan: Replaced trading ban with comprehensive regulation; established Pakistan Crypto Council

  • Vietnam: Passed legislation recognising legal status of cryptocurrency; authorised pilot exchange licensing

    United Kingdom

  • Measured approach with regulations targeting Q2 2026 implementation

  • Draft legislation published by HM Treasury on 29 April 2025

  • FCA maintains oversight of cryptoasset activities

    United Arab Emirates

  • Unified national framework positions Dubai as global crypto centre

  • VARA (Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority) regulates Dubai

  • ADGM’s FSRA provides alternative regulatory pathway in Abu Dhabi

    Key Regulatory Components

    Licensing Requirements

  • Cryptoasset service provider (CASP) authorisation

  • Capital adequacy and reserve requirements

  • Governance and risk management standards

  • Cybersecurity and operational resilience obligations

    Consumer Protection

  • Transparency and disclosure requirements for public offerings

  • Complaint handling procedures

  • Custody and segregation requirements

  • Marketing and advertising restrictions

    Market Integrity

  • Market abuse and manipulation prevention

  • Transaction monitoring and reporting

  • Insider trading prohibitions

  • Fair and orderly market requirements

    Institutional Engagement

    In 2025, approximately 80% of reviewed jurisdictions saw financial institutions announce digital asset initiatives. Markets with clear, innovation-friendly regulation became catalysts for global institutional participation.

    Ongoing Challenges

    Regulatory Arbitrage

  • Concerns regarding jurisdiction shopping by platforms

  • Cross-border compliance complexities

  • International convergence efforts ongoing

    Enforcement

  • Cyber hacks and theft remain significant concerns

  • Over $3.4 billion in cryptocurrency stolen during 2025

  • At least $2 billion attributed to DPRK-linked actors

Current Landscape (2026)

  • The EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), the first comprehensive cross-sector AI law, reached its central date of application on 2 August 2026, when Article 50 transparency obligations became enforceable and the AI Office assumed enforcement powers over general-purpose AI models; prohibited-practice bans have applied since 2 February 2025 and GPAI obligations since 2 August 2025.
  • The “AI Omnibus” simplification package (proposed 19 November 2025, politically agreed 7 May 2026, in force 27 July 2026) deferred the heaviest high-risk obligations, pushing Annex III sensitive-area rules to 2 December 2027 and product-embedded rules to 2 August 2028, reflecting European competitiveness concerns against less-regulated US and Chinese rivals.
  • Regulatory frameworks are showing a Brussels-effect extraterritorial reach: Euronews reported on 30 July 2026 that nearly half of companies citing the AI Act in governance disclosures are non-EU, with penalties up to EUR 35 million or 7% of global turnover.
  • In digital assets, the EU’s MiCA transitional grandfathering ended with no extension on 1 July 2026; ESMA ordered unauthorised CASPs to wind down, and the Commission opened a MiCA review consultation (responses extended to 30 September 2026).
  • National frameworks diverged sharply: Japan’s AI promotion statute became fully effective in September 2025 and South Korea enacted a dedicated AI law, while the UK declined a standalone AI bill, instead finalising its cryptoasset regime (FCA rules published 30 June 2026, in force 25 October 2027) and a joint Bank of England/FCA systemic-stablecoin regime.
  • International soft-law and standards activity accelerated: the FSB consulted on 12 sound practices for responsible AI adoption in finance (July 2026), IOSCO published an AI Supervisory Toolkit for capital markets (June 2026), and ISO/IEC 27090 was released though written in non-binding “should” language with no certification path.
  • The OECD counts 72 countries with some form of AI policy and all 50 US states legislating, but most frameworks remain non-binding; the persistent frontier challenge in 2026 is that legal frameworks are outpacing the operational tooling, standards and enforcement capacity needed to implement them.

References

Provenance

Graph View

Backlinks